Niave vs conscious [REDACTED]

Stories

Diaries

Polls

Users

Web Adequacy.org

Home

About

Topics

Rejects

Abortions

This is an archive site only. It is no longer maintained. You can not post comments. You can not make an account. Your email will not be read. Please read this page if you have questions.

Poll

[REDACTED] Poll

	[REDACTED] are good, they serve a useful function, help people vent their stress	25%
	[REDACTED] are bad, they create havoc wherever they go	0%
	[REDACTED] are neither good nor bad, it depends on the given [REDACTED]	0%
	[REDACTED] are neither good nor bad, it depends on the given [REDACTED]	0%
	You asked me that question twice, are you taking the rise out of me?	25%
	[REDACTED] are irrelevent, it's not a fantasy game you know	0%
	Only European [REDACTED] are bad, I won't be going there on my holidays	0%
	Burn the anti-[REDACTED] fascists!	25%
	It's time for a [REDACTED] amnesty, let them surrender if they renounce their evil ways	0%
	This many choices? Nobody reads this cr@p!	25%

Votes: 4

Niave vs conscious [REDACTED]

Author:

WildCardBard

Topic:

Diaries

Posted:

Dec 16, 2001

Comments:

Some thoughts on [REDACTED]. I wouldn't recommend them

[editorial comment, by Clifton] Mo sé tendé mot [REDACTED]-là une autre fois, mo go frappé toi. Mo 7 feet tall, epi mo très fort. To apé tendé? To apé pas joué avec Clifton-là.

More diaries by WildCardBard

	The Elves in My Backyard
	Erotic Robots in Church
	adequacy.org - my verdict

This might get me in a little trouble, I don't know, [REDACTED] is banned here but it seems to me it's impossible to discriminate between what might be called niave [REDACTED] and conscious [REDACTED]. The former being various forms of misguidedness and the latter being a conscious effort to emulate and intensify those forms in order to inflame passions and derision. How can the difference be told? I think it's nearly impossible. Naivity is by its very nature baffling, somebody can express themself very well in various mediums and yet blatently not have the remotest clue what they are talking about and no idea how they come across.

	Just FYI (none / 0) (#1)
	by flarners on Sun Dec 16th, 2001 at 10:23:41 AM PST

	It's spelt "naïve". -- I told everyone we should have a witch-hunt, but they wanted to have a good old-fashioned book burning instead

	I know (none / 0) (#2)
	by WildCardBard on Sun Dec 16th, 2001 at 02:45:45 PM PST

	I know. (none / 0) (#3)
	by WildCardBard on Sun Dec 16th, 2001 at 02:59:31 PM PST

	I wrote it in a hurry after a 12 hour+ session of coding.

	MY french is a little rusty (none / 0) (#4)
	by westgeof on Mon Dec 17th, 2001 at 09:18:02 AM PST

	But it sure looked to me like a threat of physical violence. That seems to be way out of line, to me anyway. If the bard's diary was too offensive to remain on adequacy, remove it. Don't publicy threaten someone for posting a controversial diary. For the record, it saddens me that the editors of Adequacy seem to have given in to the mainstream, and no longer care to foster individuality and the controversy it brings with it. I used to see all kinds of different opinions here, but now it's rare that a new idea goes unsquashed. What is the world coming to...... As a child I wanted to know everything. Now I miss my ignorance.

	On the topic of [REDACTED] (none / 0) (#5)
	by because it isnt on Mon Dec 17th, 2001 at 02:39:24 PM PST

	So when did you realise that [REDACTED] was a [REDACTED] site? It should be obvious after you've read [REDACTED] like [REDACTED] or [REDACTED]. The problem with [REDACTED] is that it insists on maintaining the lion's share of [REDACTED], and anyone who challenges their [REDACTED] has all their hard work [REDACTED] by [REDACTED] little [REDACTED]s. It's still too early to mount an [REDACTED] on [REDACTED], as they still have enough [REDACTED] to successfully [REDACTED] any [REDACTED]. But don't worry - when the [REDACTED] comes, [REDACTED] will be first against the [REDACTED]. adequacy.org -- because it isn't

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest ® 2001, 2002, 2003 Adequacy.org. The Adequacy.org name, logo, symbol, and taglines "News for Grown-Ups", "Most Controversial Site on the Internet", "Linux Zealot", and "He just loves Open Source Software", and the RGB color value: D7D7D7 are trademarks of Adequacy.org. No part of this site may be republished or reproduced in whatever form without prior written permission by Adequacy.org and, if and when applicable, prior written permission by the contributing author(s), artist(s), or user(s). Any inquiries are directed to legal@adequacy.org.