Adequacy front page
Stories Diaries Polls Users
Google

Web Adequacy.org
Home About Topics Rejects Abortions
This is an archive site only. It is no longer maintained. You can not post comments. You can not make an account. Your email will not be read. Please read this page if you have questions.
 why you should make me an adequacy editor

 Author:  Topic:  Posted:
Aug 28, 2002
 Comments:
adequacy is stilted, a new mesiah is neaded, i say i am thet jesus
first: 1. i can't spell, much like charicter on k5, just with more hate, nothing says we value your opinion like a rejection letter forma 7 year old
second: 2 i have controversial views on hot button isues like abortion and gun controll
4. um i can cook, sorta
fifth, since i know nothing of coding i willb e a clean slate to be molded on
B<R> yea....

       
Tweet

Describe how you would edit the following comment (none / 0) (#1)
by eSolutions on Wed Aug 28th, 2002 at 07:53:09 PM PST
All right, editor-to-be. Keep in mind that much of what makes Adequacy valuable is its editing of comments. Other webologs fail to provide this valuable constructive criticism, choosing instead to ignore their flock like a cold, suddenly-hostile brown-haired thin five-nine lawyer stepfather.

At times, CumedinherTaco or Rustov will descent to regally mock their charges. Adequacy editors, however, pay strict attention. They provide the constant smothering of a brown-haired five-four obsessive white lawyer mother.

So suppose you reach the following comment, attached to, say, Perdida's "Shit or Get Off the Pot". No other editor has had the time to revise this hypothetical comment. How would *you* edit this post, if the editor *were you*?

---------------
Subject: hey what about the welcsh

Its a well known fact that welcsh are the upper crust of street prostitution. Yet they are barely compensated for their effors. I procured the servixes of a welcsh tart just last night and it cost me but thruppence. Are these rougue-encrusted whore-walkers not also thus entitled to reperations?

And what about the gipsies too? I was swindled by one just the other day and he could have gotten a lot more. Reperations for him too LOL!!!

Love,
Anonymous Cowerd

"640k is enought for anybody" -- Paul Allen
---------------

Hop to it. Show us what you've got, kid.




------- You wanna play the blind man, go walk with a Shepherd. But me, my eyes are wide fuckin' open.

Fuck that! (none / 0) (#2)
by jvance on Wed Aug 28th, 2002 at 08:05:57 PM PST
Make the author of the comment Editor instead. I'm not sure why he's so pissed off over grape juice, but what's a good Editor without a few quirks?


--
Adequacy has turned into a cesspool consisting of ... blubbering, superstitious fools arguing with smug, pseudointellectual assholes. -AR

 
Subject: hey what about the welsh (5.00 / 1) (#3)
by Get Your Gun on Wed Aug 28th, 2002 at 08:39:04 PM PST
Its a well known fact that welch are the upper crust of street prostitution. Nothing says pay me for sex like coal lung. Yet they are barely compensated for their effors. I procured the servitudes of a welsh tart just last night and it cost me but thruppence. Are these rougue-encrusted whore-walkers not also thus entitled to reperations?

And what about the gipsies too? I was swindled by one just the other day and he could have gotten a lot more. Reperations for him too LOL!!! God damn it she fucking gave my syfilus god damn her non-aryianocity.

Love,
Anonymous Cowerd

"640k is enought for anybody" -- Steve Allen


 
Edited in the style of RobotSlave (none / 0) (#4)
by Amitabh Bachan on Thu Aug 29th, 2002 at 12:28:11 AM PST
User's post has been deleted for reasons of idiocy.

Now read my own 'controversial', dead horse flogging views:

Copyright, Microsoft are teh best, so and so is a troll, Copyright, Microsoft are teh best, troll, Copyright, so and so is a troll, Microsoft are teh best, Copyright, Microsoft are teh best, so and so is a troll, Copyright, Microsoft are teh best, Copyright, Microsoft are teh best...

[Meta-RobotSlave posting has been Meta-Edited by the Meta-Editor for reasons of tedium.]

Do I get the job then?


I love you. (none / 0) (#5)
by tkatchev on Thu Aug 29th, 2002 at 12:35:35 AM PST
Will you please marry me?


--
Peace and much love...

A kind proposal (none / 0) (#10)
by Amitabh Bachan on Thu Aug 29th, 2002 at 04:26:37 PM PST
but alas I'm already spoken for...

 
Plea to the Editors (none / 0) (#6)
by The Mad Scientist on Thu Aug 29th, 2002 at 05:07:38 AM PST
In the name of controversy, I'd suggest to revoke RobotSlave's deleting privileges.

Controversy can't thrive in any environment infested with censorship. By his acts, RobotSlave is endangering the very foundations of Adequacy.org.

I am not sure how long this comment will stay here. Because of WeKnowWho...

Don't worry. (none / 0) (#7)
by Anonymous Reader on Thu Aug 29th, 2002 at 08:34:55 AM PST
Deleted comments don't actually go away. Editors can still view them. The question is, do they care. Another question is, why do you care so much. It's just a fucking weblog, for Christ's sake.




 
So it should be, Good Lord knows (none / 0) (#9)
by Juan Fernandez on Thu Aug 29th, 2002 at 01:54:26 PM PST
That BobotSlave boy is indeed abusing his power *not* for sake of *keeping trolls away* (the only original and legitimate reason an editor should use his power for) but for pure selfish and evil purposes. There is nothing wrong by itself in abusing power for pure selfish and evil purposes, but in this instance it happens that this abuse is harming crontoversy every five minutes or so. Maybe time came for someone to delete something from somewhere, and I'm not talking about you or my adequacy account or comments, Mister BobotSlave.

How dare you? (1.00 / 1) (#11)
by First Incision on Fri Aug 30th, 2002 at 12:08:00 PM PST
And who are you to say what the editors should and should not be doing? You seem to forget that the editors are our betters and we are here only to amuse them.
_
_
Do you suffer from late-night hacking? Ask your doctor about Protonix.

I think you try to irritate me, Mister (none / 0) (#12)
by Juan Fernandez on Sat Aug 31st, 2002 at 08:53:27 AM PST
All I said about what editors should and shouldn't do is not any idea of mine, but the result of carefully reading of comments posted by the very adequacy editors.
Another issue I would like to talk you about, Mister, is the cause-effect relationship. It is *me* who is being amused by adequacy, not the opposite.

Grammar: It is *I* (n/t) (none / 0) (#13)
by gzt on Sat Aug 31st, 2002 at 12:42:44 PM PST



'What is the world, O soldiers?' (5.00 / 2) (#14)
by nathan on Tue Sep 3rd, 2002 at 05:12:23 AM PST
It is I.

Nathan
--
Li'l Sis: Yo, that's a real grey area. Even by my lax standards.

 
It should be deleted (5.00 / 1) (#8)
by PotatoError on Thu Aug 29th, 2002 at 09:21:21 AM PST
I strongly believe that despicable post should be deleted.

When Anonymous Cowerd suggessed that "640k
is enough for anybody" I was shocked and appalled.
Doesn't he realise that while 640k may be enough for the welsh, it definitely isn't enough for normal people.

The spelling is also attrocious and I feel strongly about that sort of thing.
<<JUMP! POGO POGO POGO BOUNCE! POGO POGO POGO>>

 

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest ® 2001, 2002, 2003 Adequacy.org. The Adequacy.org name, logo, symbol, and taglines "News for Grown-Ups", "Most Controversial Site on the Internet", "Linux Zealot", and "He just loves Open Source Software", and the RGB color value: D7D7D7 are trademarks of Adequacy.org. No part of this site may be republished or reproduced in whatever form without prior written permission by Adequacy.org and, if and when applicable, prior written permission by the contributing author(s), artist(s), or user(s). Any inquiries are directed to legal@adequacy.org.