|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
This is an archive site only. It is no longer maintained.
You can not post comments. You can not make an account. Your email
will not be read. Please read this
page if you have questions. |
||||||||||
Like her now-deceased coworker Bob Stevens, Stephanie Dailey gained notoriety in the mainstream
media for her exposure to the deadly Ames strain of the anthrax virus. Between swab tests, she
willingly granted several media interviews, beaming and smiling at the cameras and presenting
her cheery disposition across CNN, CNBC, and FOX News television screens. These feel-good segments
lifted Stephanie up as a hero, a common victim of possible terrorism whose spirit and cheeriness
provided a model for all those exposed to the threats of evil in America.
But is Stephanie Dailey for real? Is she really just an innocent target? Or is Stephanie the master of a personal plot of her own, a psychological drama played out on the stage of mass media? And is this type of threat a greater danger than even Osama Bin Laden's evil plans? [editor's note, by jelerial] Adequacy.org, the most most controversial site on the Internet, is forming a new policy - if you submit an anonymous story to us for posting, please provide a method for us to contact you. We need assurance that the story is not plagiarised, or stolen from another site as many other popular news sites are famous for doing. |
|||
The anthrax fatality at American Media focused nationwide attention on three people who would
otherwise have never drawn a second glance. First was Bob Stevens, a photo editor who died of anthrax inhalation.
Second was Ernesto Blanco, a mailroom worker who survived exposure but remains on medication. Both of these men had defined roles in the
company, and a clear route of exposure. The third victim was Stephanie Dailey, who apparently
was exposed to the airborne bacteria, but who cannot explain her whereabouts and
refuses to discuss anything about the incident. An office services associate, Ms. Dailey has
consistently deflected meaningful questions on the details of the case and instead focused media attention
on her attitude, her course of treatment, and the extent of her emotional trauma.
Stephanie's continued persistence on her own issues in the context of a greater tragedy leads to two possible conclusions:
Self-mutilation, commonly called "cutting," is a set of behaviours characterized by focused injury to one's own body, often taking the form of self-inflicted razor or knife cuts to the arms, legs, and torso. Often unfairly classified as a teen practice akin to anorexia or overapplication of benzoyl peroxide, self-mutilation behaviour can occur in people of all ages. In most cases the self-mutilation is purely personal activity designed to counteract stress, anxiety, or personally unsettling social situations. However, in some extreme cases, the self-injury is designed to draw attention and indeed sympathy from those surrounding the afflicted person, which often backfires and causes resentment and anger on all sides. There is a statistical correlation between obesity and self-mutilation. Often fat people have a negative body image and wish to damage themselves as punishment. In other cases fat people feel they are ignored and want to draw attention to themselves. Self-mutilation is one common expression of this attention-seeking behavior. Stephanie Dailey, as a fat person with a need for attention, clearly fits the profile of a potential self-mutilator. She therefore had the motive and the callous disregard for personal safety required to deliberately release anthrax bacteria in a desperate bid for national coverage. But did she have the means? The Ames strain of anthrax, also known as B. anthracis V770-NP1-R, is a well-known variant first developed by the US Department of Agriculture in the 1950's as a gold standard for creating more efficacious human anthrax vaccines. It is widely used as a benchmark for testing various biowarfare strategies, as it primarily presents an airborne inhalation threat and is therefore a worst case scenario for widespread civilian disaster response. As a result of its standardization, the Ames strain has become a relatively available research tool, to the extent that samples can be obtained for research purposes by such insecure and unmonitored facilities as veterinary research laboratories. Anyone with access to one of these facilities, even someone relatively low in such an organization, for example a temporary office services assistant, would be able to obtain a sample of Ames strain anthrax bacteria with little effort. If the temporary office services assistant then moved on to another job, perhaps at a supermarket tabloid company in Florida, that temporary office services assistant could easily bring that anthrax along to the new job, just in case. Motive. Means. Opportunity.
This time only one person lost his life, but statistics show that Stephanie is not alone. There
are any number of temporary office services assistants in exactly the same situation, waiting to release deadly strains
of Bacillus anthracis into the atmosphere, killing coworkers and halting the publication of supermarket tabloids for
one reason and one reason only: to get their negative body image broadcast worldwide on CNN. We must stop these "heroes" before
another Florida tragedy hits the morning news. |