|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
This is an archive site only. It is no longer maintained.
You can not post comments. You can not make an account. Your email
will not be read. Please read this
page if you have questions. |
||||||||||
What is a tree? That is a question that has hounded me for a while. Well, after lots of consideration I have concluded that a tree is nothing more than a machine.
|
|||
Think about it, all trees do is suck water up and grow leaves. They don't have brains so they can't think or make decisions like living creatures can. They are so uncomplicated that they are fully documented in primary school science books.
So we must conclude that regardless of whether God or Evolution made them, trees are nothing more than simple machines which convert carbon dioxide into oxygen and vice versa. So why does society constantly refer to them being alive? Why do school teachers insist on teaching kids that they are "alive"? Would these same morons call my computer alive? no, probably not. It seems that if an object is biological it is automatically classed as alive by these fools. Do they plan carrying on this charade when we build biological computers? or when we invent artificial trees? This doesn't just go for trees. Flowers, vegetables, shrubs, fruit, bushes and grass are all misrepresented and some of these are laughable. I mean, what the fuck does grass do? The only thing you can say about grass is that its green and points up. My wrist watch is far more complicated but noone would be dumb enough to state that it was alive in any context.
So why do we put up with this buffonary? Surely this makes our already mind bogglingly stupid species look even stupider. I propose that everyone who reads this holds this information in their heads and release it to which ever fool contradicts it in your present. |