|
Stories
| Home | About | Topics | Rejects | Abortions |
This is an archive site only. It is no longer maintained.
You can not post comments. You can not make an account. Your email
will not be read. Please read this
page if you have questions.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
This is an archive site only. It is no longer maintained.
You can not post comments. You can not make an account. Your email
will not be read. Please read this
page if you have questions. |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
You missed one... (none / 0) (#1) |
|
by tkatchev on Sun Dec 23rd, 2001 at 08:38:22 PM PST |
|
|
|
Where is "kleptocracy"? -- Peace and much love... |
|
I don't think it was forgotten (5.00 / 3) (#2) |
|
by osm on Sun Dec 23rd, 2001 at 11:13:22 PM PST |
|
|
|
Kleptocracy is the same as socialism, which isn't a valid form of government. |
|
yes, good point (none / 0) (#8) |
|
by philipm on Tue Dec 25th, 2001 at 07:52:21 AM PST |
|
|
|
yes, very good point - Does the form of government actually have to "work" (you know - be beneficial to the people and stuff) to be considered? --philipm |
|
Kleptocracy= Microsoft (1.00 / 1) (#14) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Sat Dec 29th, 2001 at 07:04:04 AM PST |
|
|
|
God Bless America!
God Bless Bill, the symbol of the "American dream" Linus go home |
|
It's official! (1.00 / 1) (#3) |
|
by lowapproach on Sun Dec 23rd, 2001 at 11:30:45 PM PST |
|
|
|
At press time, rule by the cock is twice as popular as any form of government at Adequacy.org. Editors, take note. |
|
'Rule by the cock' (none / 0) (#4) |
|
by Slubberdegullion on Mon Dec 24th, 2001 at 10:28:09 AM PST |
|
|
|
While deconstruction and translation of the root words in 'phallocracy' will, in fact, give you 'rule by the phallus', this is not the meaning of the word. Phallocracy is used to describe a patriarchy, either to mockingly suggest that a male-dominated government is predominantly concerned with their own penes, or to describe an unusual level male sexual dominance and oppression, e.g. legal rape, harems etc.. The Taliban could be described as a phallocracy as well as Shari'a law. |
|
sexist (none / 0) (#7) |
|
by nathan on Mon Dec 24th, 2001 at 10:09:31 PM PST |
|
|
|
As if the clitoris were not as validly a phallus as the penis. For the record, the universities are also a bastion of phallocracy. Nathan -- Li'l Sis: Yo, that's a real grey area. Even by my lax standards. |
|
Has anybody noticed that Phallocracy... (3.00 / 2) (#5) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Mon Dec 24th, 2001 at 03:17:58 PM PST |
|
|
|
...has the biggest, eh ... nevermind. |
|
on a serious note... (none / 0) (#6) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Mon Dec 24th, 2001 at 09:15:47 PM PST |
|
|
|
elightened despotism was the best thing that ever happened |
|
Isn't (none / 0) (#9) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Tue Dec 25th, 2001 at 10:48:38 AM PST |
|
|
|
Sharia Law a form of Theocracy?
Aren't those options redundant? Get with the program people! |
|
Don't you mean... (none / 0) (#10) |
|
by RobotSlave on Wed Dec 26th, 2001 at 02:46:53 AM PST |
|
|
|
..."get with the pogrom?"
So very sorry, everyone. I will now self-flagellate. Vigorously. © 2002, RobotSlave. You may not reproduce this material, in whole or in part, without written permission of the owner. |
|
What about cryptarchy? (none / 0) (#11) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Wed Dec 26th, 2001 at 02:39:42 PM PST |
|
|
|
My favourite form of government is that of adequacy.org itself, the so called 'secret rule'. |
|
myeah, you left out Democracy (nt) (none / 0) (#12) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Sat Dec 29th, 2001 at 01:00:18 AM PST |
|
|
|
|
What do you mean? (none / 0) (#13) |
|
by tkatchev on Sat Dec 29th, 2001 at 04:30:59 AM PST |
|
|
|
Fascism is already there.
(c) "Everything that isn't anarchy is fascism." -- Peace and much love... |
|
the true meaning of anarchy vs "anarchists&qu (none / 0) (#15) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Mon Dec 31st, 2001 at 02:21:54 PM PST |
|
|
|
Anarchy is, by definition, the total lack of government. As we all know, if true anarchy exists then chaos soon ensues. However, if we go with the ideals of "anarchists" then we would have a different social system. "Anarchists" do not believe in the absence of government, but rather the lack of a NEED for government. This is truely the ideal situation for humanity because under the "anarchists" ideals all people would cooperate to further the growth and well being of the society. Very few people can disagree that this would be the best form of "government" because it is the only one which embraces all of the ideals of Christianity and other religions with similar ideals. Anarchy in this sence, however, is almost impossible because of the nature of human beings. This IS possible on a small scale, as seen in small communes, but has never been truely practiced. |
 |
34 votes - 5 %
